Legal Opinion

State v. Grady

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1978No. 7814SC323PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

The defendant has brought forward three assignments of error. He first contends that the manner of the investigation essen tially constituted a suppression of evidence favorable to the defendant and resulted in a denial of due process.

The defendant’s first argument is that he was denied due process when E. C. Ray was allowed to testify for the State at the first trial, contrary to true facts known to a detective and the district attorney, that he did not have a gun the night of the incident. The defendant argues that such conduct denied the defendant evidence that could have led…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Jones v. SchafferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. State v. . DemaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ParksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Waynick Construction, Inc. v. YorkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Hogsed v. RayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API