Legal Opinion

Hogsed v. Ray

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 16, 1988No. 8730SC292Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendants first call upon us to decide whether the trial court erred in denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the grounds that plaintiffs evidence was insufficient to establish actionable negligence as a matter of law. It is a quite familiar rule of civil procedure that:

[A] [motion] [for] [j]udgment notwithstanding the verdict should be granted only when the evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to support the verdict. Where the evidence ad*676mitted at trial, taken in the light most favorable to the non-moving party with all reasonable inferences…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Ballenger v. Burris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. Beaty Service Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Beal v. KH STEPHENSON SUPPLY CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. GradyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API