Legal Opinion

Waynick Construction, Inc. v. York

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 4, 1984No. 8319SC736PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

I

Plaintiff contends that defendants have not excepted to the findings of fact of the court, but only to the entry of the order, and that therefore defendants’ assignments of error are not properly before this Court. See App. R. 10(b); 1 Strong’s N.C. Index 3d Appeal and Error § 28 (1976). It is well established that defendants’ broadside exception presents on appeal the question of whether the findings, established by the failure to make specific exceptions, support the conclusions of law and in turn the judgment. Anderson Chevrolet/Olds v. Higgins, 57 N.C. App. 650, 292 S.E.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Robbins v. C. W. Myers Trading Post, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Hinson v. JeffersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Anderson Chevrolet/Olds, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Katy v. CapriolaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API