Legal Opinion
Jane Doe No. 5 v. Epstein
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided February 12, 2009No. Case 08-80381-CIVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
KENNETH A. MARRA, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Jeffrey Epstein (“Defendant”)’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion for More Definite Statement, Directed to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (DE 52), filed October 6, 2008. Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 5 (“Plaintiff’) filed a response to the motion (DE 55) and Defendant filed a Reply (DE 56). The Court has carefully reviewed the motion, response, and reply, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
Background
On April 14, 2008, Plaintiff filed her…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- AVRAHAM v. GOLDENDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Doe 1 v. Varsity Brands, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- Yule v. Ocean Reef Community AssociatonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020