Kerley v. Hoehman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
EDWARDS, C.
For convenience the parties will be referred to- as plaintiffs and defendant, according to their position in the lower court.
The record discloses: That the plaintiffs are husband and wife and parents of Robert Hoehman, deceased. That defendant is a practicing physician and was the attending physician at the birth of said Robert Hoeh man, a normal healthy child, born'July 6, 1911. That a few days after the birth of said Robert Hoehman the defendant, as a physician, had prescribed for one Hoops, a cousin of the plaintiff Arthur P. Hoehman. The said Hoops was a young man,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Barker v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- Rodman v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Lambert v. Ensign Manuf'g Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
- Taylor v. Cranberry Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brookshire v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Earnest, Inc. v. LeGrandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Stasciewicz v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Pollen v. Ford Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Rock Island Coal Mining Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.