Legal Opinion

Kerley v. Hoehman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 25, 1916No. 7643PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

EDWARDS, C.

For convenience the parties will be referred to- as plaintiffs and defendant, according to their position in the lower court.

The record discloses: That the plaintiffs are husband and wife and parents of Robert Hoehman, deceased. That defendant is a practicing physician and was the attending physician at the birth of said Robert Hoeh man, a normal healthy child, born'July 6, 1911. That a few days after the birth of said Robert Hoehman the defendant, as a physician, had prescribed for one Hoops, a cousin of the plaintiff Arthur P. Hoehman. The said Hoops was a young man,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Barker v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Rodman v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Lambert v. Ensign Manuf'g Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Taylor v. Cranberry Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brookshire v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Earnest, Inc. v. LeGrandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Stasciewicz v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  4. Pollen v. Ford Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  5. Rock Island Coal Mining Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API