Pollen v. Ford Instrument Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs brought suit for infringement of six patents. The district judge found that infringement within six years preceding the commencement of suit had not been proved, and dismissed the complaint. He did not decide whether the patents were valid or whether the defendant’s acts prior to the six year period were infringements.
The plaintiffs’ patents were for range keepers used on naval vessels in connection with gun fire. The patents had expired prior to commencement of suit, and the only relief available to the plaintiffs was profits or damages for past…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Exploration Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Bement v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Osbourne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Scarborough v. Atlantic Coast Line R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Northern Metal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Grossman v. YoungDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.