Wilkins v. Queen City Savings Bank & Trust Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
On Reargument.
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
I do not understand that Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Spratley, 172 U. S. 602, 19 Sup. Ct. 308, 43 L. Ed. 569, is authority for the proposition that presence of an officer of a foreign corporation in this state for the purpose of discussing a proposed adjustment of the single controversy between it and plaintiff is sufficient to establish such a “doing business within the state” as will take the case out of the rule laid down in Goldey v. Morning News, 156 U. S. 518, 15 Sup. Ct. 559, 39 L. Ed. 517, and Conley v. Mathieson Alkali Works, 190 U. S. 406, 23 Sup. Ct. 728, 47 L.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Conley v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Louden Machinery Co. v. American Malleable Iron Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1904
- Clews v. Woodstock Iron Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Erl Anger Mills, Inc. v. Cohoes Fibre Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Atkinson v. United States Operating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Hoyt v. Ogden Portland Cement Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1911
- Henry M. Day & Co. v. Schiff, Lang & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. South Portland Engineering Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.