Conley v. Mathieson Alkali Works
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion of thy court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
The plaintiff is a citizen of the State of New York, and the defendant was incorporated in the State of Virginia. The plain - tiff as assignee of T. T. Mathieson brought this action in the Supreme Court of New York County, State of New York, against the defendant for moneys alleged to be due on a contract made and entered into by Mathieson and defendant. The complaint alleged that the contract was made in the city of New York on the 15th of August, 1893. The articles of agreement show that Mathieson’s employment was as general superintendent for the term of eight years, in. the' erection and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- People v. . American Bell Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
3Cited by157 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.