Hoyt v. Ogden Portland Cement Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
Action by Let tie T. Hoyt, as administratrix, etc., of Irwin B. Hoyt, deceased, against the Ogden Portland Cement Company. On defendant’s motion to set aside and declare null and void the service of summons in an action commenced in the state court and removed by the defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
The defendant is a corporation organized and doing business in and under the laws of the state of Utah. It has no property or place of business in the state of New York and no agent in such state. It has never carried on or done business in the state of New York unless an attempt by its president, W. J. Bell, to compromise and settle this claim made and negotiations to that end had in New York state on several occasions constitute doing business in said state of New York, or unless the hiring of Irwin B. Hoyt, the *891decedent, and another by correspondence only, it is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Remington v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Erl Anger Mills, Inc. v. Cohoes Fibre Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Atkinson v. United States Operating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Feldman Inv. Co. v. Connecticut General Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Rose City Bottling Works v. Godchaux Sugars, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Major Creek Lum. Co. v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.