Legal Opinion

Tomita v. Hotel Service Center

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1981No. 7019PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal is taken from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board’s (Appeals Board) findings that appellee’s claim was timely filed and compensable and that she was entitled to 10% permanent partial disability for the injuries she sustained.

The employer and insurance carrier have, in this appeal, raised one issue, and that is whether the appellee’s claim for workman’s compensation benefits was barred by the time limitation provision of HRS § 386-82. We hold that it was not.

The relevant facts are as follows: The appellee, Tina Tomita, was employed as a cocktail waitress at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hun v. Center PropertiesHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Evanson v. University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Bourgeois v. Brown & Root, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Patterson v. Bessemer Coal, Iron & Land Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1961
  5. In Re Securing Compensation by PalamaHawaii Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coy v. Dover Corp./Norris DivisionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Hayashi v. Scott Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Miyake v. Welders, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API