Legal Opinion

In Re Securing Compensation by Palama

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1937No. 2272PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BANKS, J. (Peteks, J., dissenting.)

By authority of section 7518, R. L. 1935, the industrial accident board has reserved to this court the following question of law: “Was the notice of injury and claim for compensation filed by John K. Palama, Sr., December 30, 1935, made within the statutory requirement contained in Section 7501, Revised Laws of Hawaii 1935, requiring that ‘ * * * claim for compensation with respect to the injury shall have been made within three months after the date of injury * * * ’, in view of the fact that, while the accident occurred on August 30,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Guderian v. Sterling Sugar & Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Brown's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Johansen v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Esposito v. Marlin-Rockwell CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flor v. HolguinHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Highway Super Market, Ltd. v. MatsuoHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Survivors of Young v. Island Feeling, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Tomita v. Hotel Service CenterHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Fukuda v. Peerless Roofing Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API