Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. International Harvester Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1978No. Civ. 50374PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

In Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804 [119 Cal.Rptr. 858, 532 P.2d 1226, 78 A.L.R.3d 393], the California Supreme Court replaced the doctrine of contributory negligence, incorporated in the California statutes since the Field Code, with the principle of “pure” comparative negligence. (13 Cal.3d at pp. 814, 827.) In American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior Court (1978) 20 Cal.3d 578 [146 Cal.Rptr. 182, 578 P.2d 899], the California high court explicated the application of the Li principle to the multi-party situation retaining the rule of joint liability of concurrent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Nest-KartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. County of Ventura v. City of CamarilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Far West Financial Corp. v. D & S CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Hoch v. Allied-Signal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API