Legal Opinion

Hutchens v. Doe

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1852PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This was an action of ejectment by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error.

The plaintiff’s lessor claimed title by virtue of a sale of the premises in controversy to satisfy two executions, he being the purchaser. The executions had been issued on judgments which he himself had obtained against the plaintiff in error. One of the judgments was for 27 dollars and the costs of the suit.

The first error assigned is, that the Court permitted the plaintiff’s lessor to amend the executions before offering them in evidence. The record does not show what amendments were made, and we must…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doe, on the Demise of Wilkins v. RueIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  2. M'Quilkin v. Doe ex dem. StoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Green v. McGrewIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Brown v. McKayIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Butler v. ThornburghIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Ferrier v. DeutchmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API