Legal Opinion

M'Quilkin v. Doe ex dem. Stoddard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1848PublishedCited by 15 opinions

ERROR to the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of ejectment, commenced in 1841, for a quarter section ofland in Vigo county. Plea, not guilty. Verdict for the plaintiff. Motion by the *582defendant for a new trial 'overruled, and judgment on the . verdict.

The objections made to the judgment are, 1. That certain evidence offered by the defendant was improperly rejected; 2. That the defendant proved that he had a good title to the land.

The record contains all the evidence which was given in the cause, and also that which was rejected. The plaintiff’s evidente was an exemplification of a patent for the land, which patent was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hunt v. JenningsIndiana Supreme Court · 1839

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners of Tippecanoe Co. v. Lafayette, Muncie, & Bloomington RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. County Department of Public Welfare v. PotthoffIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Boarad of Trustees v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Gorley v. SewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Bradstreet Co. v. City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API