Smith v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
YEAGLEY, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from appellant’s conviction of the offense of cruelty to children. 1 The sole error advanced by appellant is the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury, as requested, on the issue of intoxication as bearing upon the question of specific intent. 2 Appellant contends that specific intent is an element of the offense charged.
The appellee responds (1) that the evidence of intoxication was insufficient to warrant the instruction being given; (2) that the offense requires proof of something less than a specific intent and, therefore, it is not one…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paul J. Heideman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Spencer Womack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- State v. CooksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Khaalis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Powell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Nicholson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.