Powell v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Associate Judge:
Following a jury trial, appellant Powell was convicted of carrying a pistol without a license (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-3204) and both appellants, Fields and Powell, were convicted of armed robbery (D.C.Code 1973, §§ 22-2901 and -3202). On appeal, appel lants assert that comments made by the prosecutor during closing and rebuttal arguments constituted such prejudicial misconduct as to require a new trial. We find the prosecutor’s comments to be improper. Since we cannot say that the misconduct did not substantially sway the judgment of the jury in its deliberations in the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Viereck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Dyson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. EnglandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- Mercer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hawthorne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.