Legal Opinion

Carter v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 1987No. 85-710PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of unauthorized use of a vehicle, assault on a police officer with a dangerous weapon (an automobile), and five counts of malicious destruction of property (five automobiles). 1 On appeal he contends that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the defense of accident, in not permitting him to offer evidence of intoxication in support of that defense, in defining the element of malice while instructing on the offense of malicious destruction of property, and in refusing to give an instruction on intoxication…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Stevenson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Paul Belton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Terry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Parks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Durant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Matthews v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Phenis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API