Spencer Womack v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of the crime of robbery, 22 D.C.Code § 2901, an element of which is the specific intent to rob. Appellant prepared an instruction on intoxication which the trial judge refused to give because intoxication was not the theory of the defense. But a defendant is entitled to an instruction on any issue fairly raised by the evidence, whether or not consistent with the defendant’s testimony or the defense trial theory. Specifically, “ * * * a defendant accused of robbery is entitled to an instruction on drunkenness as bearing on intent * * * if sufficient evidence on the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Paul J. Heideman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
3Cited by63 opinions
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. SantiagoHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
- Paul Belton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Ronald Gene Kenyon, Also Known as Ronald G. BingenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Khaalis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.