Legal Opinion

Lopez v. Allen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1975No. 11660PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellants Julio Lopez, Sr., and his son, Julio Lopez, Jr., instituted this action against defendant-respondent, Rulon Allen, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Julio Lopez, Jr., in an accident on Allen’s farm while he was in Allen’s employ. At trial, the jury returned a special verdict finding that Julio Lopez, Jr., and Allen each were negligent in the amount of fifty percent. Judgment was entered in accordance with the verdict. The plaintiffs appeal from that judgment. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Julio Lopez, Jr. (hereinafter Julio),…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rindlisbaker v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hooton v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Meissner v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Sampson v. LaytonIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hansen v. Howard O. Miller, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. GaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Sheets v. Agro-West, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Whitehead v. American Motors Sales Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Patino Ex Rel. Richardson v. Grigg & Anderson FarmsIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. McDrummond v. Montgomery Elevator CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API