McDrummond v. Montgomery Elevator Company
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs-appellants, William Mc-Drummond, Swift & Company, and Globe Indemnity Company instituted this action against defendant-respondent Montgomery Elevator Company, which is engaged in inspecting and maintaining elevators. Mc-Drummond seeks compensation for injuries received when he fell down an elevator shaft after the floor of the elevator car gave way. McDrummond’s employer, Swift & Company, and Swift’s surety, Globe Indemnity Company, seek damages by subrogation for workmen's compensation benefits paid to McDrummond. I.C. § 72-204 (repealed S.L.1971, Ch. 124,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Messmer v. KerIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Schaefer v. Elswood Trailer SalesIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Fawcett v. IrbyIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Roe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pocatello Industrial Park Co. v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Arctic Structures, Inc. v. WedmoreAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Tucker v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- McBride v. Ford Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Bowman v. Twin Falls Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.