Legal Opinion
Ives v. Guilford Mills, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 26, 1998No. 5:97-cr-00373PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORAND UM-DECISION AND ORDER
KAHN, District Judge.
In this diversity action, plaintiff has brought claims for tortious interference with contract and slander. Now before the Court are two motions made by the defendants: a motion to dismiss and a motion to disqualify plaintiffs attorney. In a previous Order dated February 20,1998, the Court directed the parties to address the issues raised in defendants’ motion to dismiss in light of the amended complaint’s allegations. These supplemental arguments have been filed. Now, and for the reasons discussed below, the motion to dismiss is granted in…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Liberman v. GelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Parent v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
- Reserve Solutions Inc. v. VERNAGLIADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Vester Russell v. City of Milwaukee, City of Milwaukee Employees' Retirement System Annuity & Pension Board, Gary J. BrazgelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Scholastic, Inc. v. StoufferDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Shabbir v. Pakistan International AirlinesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.