Comer v. Murphy Oil USA
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER:
This case was voted en banc by a duly constituted quorum of the court consisting of nine members in regular active service who are not disqualified. Fed. R.App. P. 35(a); 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
The grant of rehearing en banc in this case “vacate[d] the panel opinion and judgment of the court and stay[ed] the-mandate.” 5th Cir. R. 41.3.; see also Thompson v. Connick, 578 F.3d 293 (5th Cir.2009) (en banc) (same).
After the en banc court was properly constituted, new circumstances *1054arose that caused the disqualification and recusal of one of the nine judges, leaving only eight judges in regular…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nguyen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Thompson v. ConnickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Walter L. Nixon, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Tobin, Secretary of Labor v. RameyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
3Cited by11 opinions
- Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- North Carolina State Conference of NAACP v. McCroryDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Asgeirsson v. Texas Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Comer v. Murphy Oil Usa, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2012
- Abraham Watkins v. FesterygaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.