Legal Opinion
United States v. Walter L. Nixon, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 8, 1987No. 86-4248PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING and SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
2Per curiam
The petition for rehearing is DENIED, and no member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED. * * *
This opinion is entered by the panel in response to appellant’s “Memorandum Concerning En Banc Procedures” filed herein in connection with, but separate from and subsequent to, appellant’s suggestion for rehearing en banc. Appellant’s referenced…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Cox v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Western Pacific Railroad Corp. v. Western Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Shenker v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ida Mary Lewis v. University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Book CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Walter L. Nixon, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Shell Offshore, Inc. v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Comer v. Murphy Oil USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Harry E. ClaiborneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Mississippi State Bar v. NixonMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.