Asgeirsson v. Texas Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs, who are local government officials, sued seeking a declaration that a provision of the Texas Open Meetings Act (“TOMA”) violates the First Amendment. Specifically, they contend that Texas Government Code § 551.144 is a content-based restriction on political speech, is unconstitutionally vague, and is overbroad. They seek declaratory and injunctive relief, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that Section 551.144 may not be enforced.
After a bench trial, the district court held that Section 551.144 is constitutional because it is not vague or overbroad, it…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- David Stratta v. Billy HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Richard ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Ex parte FloresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Defense Distributed v. United States Department of StateDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
- Grant v. Prince George's Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.