Legal Opinion

Asgeirsson v. Texas Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 25, 2012No. 11-50441PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs, who are local government officials, sued seeking a declaration that a provision of the Texas Open Meetings Act (“TOMA”) violates the First Amendment. Specifically, they contend that Texas Government Code § 551.144 is a content-based restriction on political speech, is unconstitutionally vague, and is overbroad. They seek declaratory and injunctive relief, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that Section 551.144 may not be enforced.

After a bench trial, the district court held that Section 551.144 is constitutional because it is not vague or overbroad, it…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. David Stratta v. Billy HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Richard ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  3. Ex parte FloresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Defense Distributed v. United States Department of StateDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
  5. Grant v. Prince George's Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API