Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1971No. 59PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

This case presents an anomalous situation. Defendant objected to a question which the solicitor asked a State’s witness. Defendant did not move for a mistrial or to quash the bill of indictment. Indeed, he made no motion whatever. Yet the judge, over the objection of both State and defendant, declared a mistrial and entered an order reciting that he had treated defendant’s objection as a motion for mistrial and allowed the motion. Notwithstanding, the order of mistrial stands, albeit the record will not support the premise upon which it is based.

The State, anticipating that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  2. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. State v. SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. State v. . DoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API