Legal Opinion

State v. . Dove

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1942PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Tbe defendant was indicted for murder. However, at tbe solicitor’s election be was not put on trial for first degree murder but for murder in tbe second degree or manslaughter. This was equivalent to taking a nolle prosequi on tbe capital charge. S. v. Gregory, 203 N. C., 528, 166 S. E., 387. At tbe close of tbe State’s evidence defendant’s motion for judgment as of ndnsuit was denied. Tbe solicitor then moved to be permitted to offer additional testimony. This motion was allowed, and, it appearing that tbe evidence desired was not presently available, tbe court ordered a mistrial, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. Tyson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. State v. . UptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brock v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. State v. HickeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. BowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. BallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. HumblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API