Legal Opinion

Competitive Telecommunications Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 6, 1993No. 92-1013PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge D.H. GINSBURG.

D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:

The Competitive Telecommunications Association, MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Sprint Communications Company, and Williams Telecommunications Company petition for review of an FCC decision, entered upon remand from this court, holding that four integrated service packages offered by AT & T under its “Tariff 12” are not unreasonably discriminatory. See AT & T Communications, Revisions to Tariff F.C.C. No. 12, 6 FCCRcd 7039 (1991); § 202(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 202(a). Because…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Sea-Land Service, Inc. And Sea-Land Freight Service, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Net2Globe Intern., Inc. v. Time Warner Telecom of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  3. American Message Centers v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Sprint Communications Company, L.P., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  4. Telecom International America, Ltd. v. AT & T Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  5. C.F. Communications Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API