C.F. Communications Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:
These petitions seek review of a Federal Communications Commission decision permitting local telephone companies (known as “local exchange carriers” or “LECs”) to assess End User Common Line (“EUCL”) charges on an independent payphone provider. Petitioners — the independent payphone provider and a trade association of independent payphone providers — argue that the Commission misinterpreted its rules to arrive at its' decision. We agree, and grant the petitions for review.
I. Background
A
When a telephone customer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. Department of Energy and United States of America, Northern States Power Company (Minnesota), IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Capital Network System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Netcoalition v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- United States Telecom Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Verizon Telephone Companies v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Gilmore v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.