Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Erickson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1941PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeand, J.

A proper determination of the rights of the respective parties is thought to depend upon the construction of the Oregon statutes relating to joint tenancy. Tn 1854 the territorial legislature passed an act, of which the following is a part:

“Sec. 38. Joint tenant, or tenant in common, and his executors or administrators, may maintain an action against his co-tenant, for receiving more than his just proportion of the rents or profits of the estate owned by them as joint tenants, or tenants in common.” Stat. of Oregon, 1855, p. 410, § 38. (Enacted Jan. 16, 1854.)

The same legislature enacted the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. WaringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. VanVlackIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Erwin v. FelterIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Malone v. SullivanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Mittel v. KarlIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Halleck v. HALLECKOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State of Oregon v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Beach v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Manning v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1944

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API