Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Martin Veneer Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1943No. 2572PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a compensation suit in which there is no dispute as to the serious and disabling injury sustained by the plaintiff in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with the defendant. As a matter of fact he was paid compensation by the employer for 72 weeks, was then given light work to do, but on account of an aggravation of the injury was again put on compensation. The employer again gave him light work but with the same result as on the previous occasion and he had again to go on compensation. In addition to this, the employer paid all medical and hospital bills…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carlino v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Stieffel v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  3. Hunt v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Thompson v. Leach McClainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holliday v. Martin Veneer Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  2. Annen v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Delouche v. City of MonroeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Daigle v. Higgins IndustriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API