Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 8, 1942No. 2425PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The facts in this case are substantially as follows:
The plaintiff, Sullivan H. Hunt, a married man, residing with his wife at Westlake, Louisiana, was first employed by the defendant, Magnolia Petroleum Co., on August 2, 1937, and worked as an oil-field rough-neck in what is referred to as the Cameron Meadows District in Louisiana. At the time of this first employment he was examined by Dr. R.G. Holcomb, the defendant company's examining physician at Lake Charles, Louisiana. He worked intermittently in Louisiana, but on one occasion was sent for a brief period to the Amelia oil-field in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
- Degray v. Miller Bros. Con. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Hargis v. McWilliams Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Claim of Gilbert v. Des Lauriers Column Mould Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Babineaux v. Southeastern Drilling CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Williams v. Travelers Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
- Fruge v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Welch v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.