Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Martin Veneer Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 6, 1944No. 37395PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

Enoch Holliday, alleging that he was totally and permanently disabled as the result of an injury sustained on March 16, 1937, during the course of his employment, is seeking to recover compensation from his employer, Edward B. Martin, who operates a lumber business (a hazardous occupation) in the name of the Martin Veneer Company, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act No. 20 of 1914, subject to a credit for the compensation payments made at the time of this suit and off-set compensation out of the wages received by him during two periods of re-employment by his employer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carlino v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Stieffel v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  3. Holliday v. Martin Veneer Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1943

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. Continental Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  2. Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Myers v. Jahncke ServiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Daigle v. Higgins IndustriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Goodman v. Hillyer, Deutsch, Edwards, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API