Legal Opinion

Carlino v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 29, 1940No. 35737PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ODOM, Justice.

This is a suit for compensation brought against defendant, the insurer of the City of Alexandria, under Section 8, Subsection 1, Paragraph (b), of Act No. 20 of 1914, as finally amended by Act No. 242 of 1928, p. 357, which reads as follows:

“(b) For injury producing permanent total disability to do work of any reasonable character, sixty-five per centum of wages during the period of disability, not, however, beyond four hundred weeks.”

Counsel for plaintiff, the relator here, has concisely stated the cause of action in Paragraph 1 of his application to this court for writs, which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rylander v. T. Smith & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Norwood v. Lake Bisteneau Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  3. Hulo v. City of New IberiaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Brannon v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. Reed v. Calcasieu Paper CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  3. Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  4. Walters v. General Accident & Fire Assur. Corp., Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Edwards v. Louisiana Forestry CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API