Legal Opinion

Comer v. Associated Almond Growers

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1929No. Docket No. 7109PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiffs commenced an action to recover a judgment against the defendant for money. Thereafter they filed a second amended complaint. The defendant demurred. Its demurrer was overruled and thereafter it filed an answer which, among other things, pleaded an earlier judgment as a bar. A trial was had in the trial court before the court sitting without a jury. The court made findings in favor of the plaintiffs, and from a judgment entered thereon the defendant has appealed. In their second amended complaint the plaintiffs alleged the corporate capacity of the defendant; that on the first…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Anderson v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vogel v. ShawWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hall v. CoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Tuck v. GudnasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Fairchild v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Wilson v. GreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API