Legal Opinion
Thompson & Tomada Enterprises, Inc. v. McKinley County
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 20, 1991No. 19119PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BACA, Justice.
Clarence Thompson and Tomada Enterprises, Inc., plaintiffs below and owners of retail liquor establishments with drive-up windows, appeal the dismissal of their complaint against McKinley County and the city of Gallup in an action seeking to declare unconstitutional NMSA 1978, Section 60-7A-l(F) (Cum.Supp.1990, as amended 1991 N.M.Laws, ch. 255). 1 That subsection of the Liquor Control Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 60-3A-1 to -8A-19 (Repl.Pamp. 1987 & Cum.Supp.1990, as amended 1991 N.M.Laws, ch. 255), provides for an election in eligible counties on the question: “Shall a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Richardson Ex Rel. Estate of Richardson v. Carnegie Library Restaurant, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Davy v. McNeillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. IngallsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. SpearsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Garcia on Behalf of Garcia v. La FargeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Madrid v. St. Joseph HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Las Cruces v. El Paso Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- West Old Town Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- Powell v. New Mexico State Highway & Transportation DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.