State v. Ingalls
New Mexico Supreme Court
Appeal from the District tSourt of Chaves County; •John T. McClure, District Judge; The subject of the act, “An Act to Provide for State License on Automobiles,” is clearly expressed in its title. Session Laws 1912, chap. 28; Commonwealth v. Gregg, 161 Pa. 586. The act in question is constitutional, viewed from any point.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District tSourt of Chaves County; •John T. McClure, District Judge; The subject of the act, “An Act to Provide for State License on Automobiles,” is clearly expressed in its title. Session Laws 1912, chap. 28; Commonwealth v. Gregg, 161 Pa. 586. The act in question is constitutional, viewed from any point. Cleary v. Johnston, 74 Atl. 538; Berry, Laws of Automobiles, par. 86; State ex rel. v. Hudson, 78 Mo. 302; State v. Hipp, 38 Ohio 225; State v. Unwin, 64 Atl. 163; 68 Atl. 110; Ivane v. Titus- 80,Atl. 453. Imposition of license fees for revenue purposes was clearly within…
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT.
HANNA, J. —
The first ground of the demurrer is in substance that the act of the legislature upon whjch the information is based, chap.,28, Session Laws 1912, is unconstitutional for the reason that the act embraces more than one subject and the subject is not clearly expressed in the title. The title of the act is, ‘‘An Act to Provide for State License on Automobiles.”
It is argued by appellee that the object of the act is two-fold: (a) To license automobiles, and (b) to raise revenue for road purposes.. The statute in question, sec. 3, cliaq). 28. Session Laws of 1912,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stone v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Kane v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Morgan v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
- State v. SwagertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Capitol Addition Bldg. Commission v. ConnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Raton v. SprouleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State Ex Rel. State Park & Recreation Commission v. New Mexico State AuthorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Black & White Taxicab Co. v. Standard Oil Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.