Holley v. County of Orange
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This action was brought to recover money paid under protest by the plaintiff, pursuant to section 3819 of the Political Code, as amended in 1893. (Stats. 1893, p. 22.)
The complaint avers that the plaintiff was, at all times mentioned therein, the owner of certain lands in what is known as the Bolsa Drainage Ditch District, county of Orange, state of California, which lands are described in apt terms.
That on the seventeenth day of November, 1890, a petition signed by two or more landowners in the vicinity of plaintiff’s land was presented to the board of supervisors of said Orange…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Smith v. PeaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Page v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
- The People v. . Bank of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. ProvinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Powell v. . TuttleNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Egan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- County of Mariposa v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Billings Sugar Co. v. FishMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- Sacramento Chamber of Commerce v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.