Legal Opinion
Plouse v. Richardson
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 21, 1971No. Civ. A. 70-760PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOURLEY, District Judge:
This Complaint has been filed to obtain review of a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying plaintiff disability benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. A. § 405(g). The immediate matter before the Court is defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
The decision of the Secretary must be affirmed if substantial evidence exists to support the denial of disability benefits. Gentile v. Finch, 423 F.2d 244 (3d Cir. 1970). Substantial evidence exists whenever there is relevant evidence which a reasonable mind can accept as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bertha M. Bittel v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Ann M. Boyd v. Marion B. Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- William Gentile v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Henry Harrell, Jr. v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Baith v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Good v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Doe v. Rockingham County School BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1987
- Young v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.