Legal Opinion
Keetz v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 13, 1964No. 378-63PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
This case presents the recurring question of the legal status of an employee of an Armed Forces Post Exchange. Plaintiff was separated on June 13, 1960, from his position as an employee of the Air Forces Europe Exchange, Army and Air Force Exchange Service, United States Air Force. Plaintiff seeks by this action to recover from the United States back salary and appropriate allowances lost for the period following his alleged wrongful separation from employment. The basis of his action is grounded on the claim that his separation was arbitrary and capricious in that the separating…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pulaski Cab Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Glen P. Gradall v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Edelstein v. South Post Officers ClubDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1951
- Nimro v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Leroy D. Brummitt and Mary A. Brummitt v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Slattery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Angel M. Cosme Nieves v. Col. Robert C. Deshler, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- David W. Matthews and Christa Matthews, Ronald Davis and Marie Davis v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- David A. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.