David A. Young v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge:
In this suit, David A. Young, the plaintiff-appellant, sought judicial review of the action of the Army and Air Force Exchange Service, a non-appropriated fund instrumentality of the United States, 1 separating (discharging) him from his position with the Exchange Service as architect. The district court dismissed the complaint on grounds discussed below. We reverse in part, and hold that the plaintiff is entitled to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act.
I
The Complaint.
Young brought this action against the United States on September 24, 1971. On December…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- 39 Fair empl.prac.cas. 162, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,583 Eligio Castro and Rafael Diaz Diaz v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arthur Edward Sheehan v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service, an Instrumentality of the Departments of the Army and of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Arry Ortego v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Slattery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.