Legal Opinion
Tomaz L. Romero v. Department of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1983No. 82-1279PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a): Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Tomaz L. Romero, while employed by the U.S. Department of Army as a civilian guard at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal near Commerce City, Colorado, was permanently removed from service upon allegations of insubordination and threatening a superior officer with a deadly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- James L. Calhoun v. Benjamin F. Bailar, Postmaster General of the United States, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Charles H. Young v. Robert E. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Lawyer A. Adkins v. Robert Hampton, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- James F. Weiss v. United States Postal Service, Merit Systems Protection Board, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Varn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Cleotilde Archuleta v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Cohen v. AustinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Alvarado v. WynneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.