James L. Calhoun v. Benjamin F. Bailar, Postmaster General of the United States, Defendant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KARLTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff challenges his discharge for falsifying mail volume records on the ground that the administrative findings were not supported by substantial evidence. He appeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment. The issue he posits on appeal is whether or not hearsay statements, subsequently disavowed on direct examination, constitute “substantial” evidence sufficient to support the administrative determination.
This Court’s review function in administrative discharge cases is limited “to a determination that the applicable procedures have been complied…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Asarco, Inc. v. U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Donald M. Rhinehart v. Robert H. Rinch, Etc. (Wilbur J. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Willapoint Oysters, Inc. v. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- James Sample v. Richard Schweiker , Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Peter Gabriel John McMullen v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. CejaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Story v. Shelter Bay CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Lukas E. Hoska, III v. United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.