Legal Opinion
Cohen v. Austin
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 25, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-CV-5623PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Before the Court are the cross-motions for summary judgment of the parties pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case involves an action filed by plaintiff, Robert N. Cohen, who was removed from his position as a GS-12 contract specialist with defendant, General Services Administration. The case has a lengthy procedural history, which we have already fully discussed in a previous opinion. See Cohen v. Austin, 833 F.Supp. 512 (E.D.Pa.1993) (de nying an earlier motion for summary judgment filed by defendant). Suffice it…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cohen v. AustinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Boandl v. GeithnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Cohen v. AustinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Hunter v. FilipDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011