Legal Opinion

R. J. Enstrom Corporation v. Interceptor Corporation and United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 14, 1975No. 74-1561PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

This litigation arises out of an aviation accident which resulted in the total loss of an “Interceptor 400” aircraft, owned by plaintiff, R. J. Enstrom Corporation. The airplane was manufactured by Interceptor Corporation, a defendant, and given a “type certificate” by the Federal Aviation Administration. The plane was “ditched” in Santa Monica Bay in California following a “flame out” of its turboprop engine asserted to have been caused by fuel starvation.

Enstrom, a Michigan corporation, filed this action in the Western District of Oklahoma. Count 1 of the complaint…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Celanese Corp. Of America v. John Clark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  5. National Shawmut Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Frank Briscoe Company, Inc. v. Georgia Sprinkler Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Pandora Industries, Inc. v. Paramount Communications Inc. (In Re Wingspread Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  3. Acro Automation Systems, Inc. v. Iscont Shipping Ltd.District Court, D. Maryland · 1989
  4. NAD, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1999
  5. See v. Emhart Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API