Legal Opinion

NAD, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1999No. 31476PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*73OPINION

2Per curiam

SUMMARY

North American Drager, Inc. (“NAD”) and Invivo Research (“Invivo”) filed a motion to name Continental Casualty Company (“CNA”) as a third-party plaintiff, alleging that CNA was the real party in interest because CNA’s loan receipt agreement with its insureds was an ineffective means of preventing subrogation. The district court denied this motion. Thereafter, NAD and Invivo filed a petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that this court compel the district court to name CNA as the real party in interest. NAD alleges extraordinary injustice and irreparable harm as a result of…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. ThompsonNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Shealy v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rivero v. RiveroNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Del Webb Communities, Inc. v. PartingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. HARRISON VS. HARRISON (CHILD CUSTODY)Nevada Supreme Court · 2016
  4. HARRISON VS. HARRISON (CHILD CUSTODY)Nevada Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Harrison v. HarrisonNevada Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API