Legal Opinion

Celanese Corp. Of America v. John Clark Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1954No. 14729PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

The suit was for damages, actual and exemplary, for fire losses in plaintiff’s hydraulic die casting plant 1 resulting from the use in it of Lindol HF-X, the hydraulic fluid sold and furnished to plaintiff by defendant for such use.

The claim as set out in detail in the complaint was: that in answer to plaintiff’s inquiries as to the possible use in its business of defendant’s hydraulic fluid known as Lindol HF, 2 defendant, giving its specifications and stating that it was “nonflammable” and would “not support combustion”, recommended most highly it and a new product…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Seale. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BreadowTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. City of Dallas v. MaxwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Ford Butane Eq. Co. v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1949

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. SchwartzwaldOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Pacific Coast Agricultural Export Ass'n v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Shealy v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. United Services Automobile Association v. James B. RussomCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API