Farrakhan v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIM TAFT, Justice.
A jury convicted appellant, Quanell X Abdul Farrakhan, of the misdemeanor offense of “fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer.” See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 545.421 (Vernon 1999). The trial court assessed punishment at 180 days in jail, suspended for 180 days of community supervision, and a $300 fine. We determine (1) whether the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction; (2) whether appellant’s due process rights were violated by the State’s alleged use of perjured testimony before the grand jury; and (3) whether the trial court erred in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- McKithan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Horne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
- Redwine v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- Farrakhan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Trejo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.