Legal Opinion

Bramwell v. Kuhle

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 1960No. Civ. 6427PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

Plaintiffs and respondents are the owners of residence property in a tract of land in the Mnirlands area of La Jolla. They brought this action to enjoin the construction of a residence upon a lot owned by defendant and appellant Howard C. Kuhle and wife and upon which defendant and appellant Schwarzkopf is engaged as a contractor. Plaintiffs claim that the proposed construction is in violation of restrictions placed on the property by the sub-dividers, referred to in the restrictions as “owners.” No contention is made that the restrictions are invalid or inoperative as to the property in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hannula v. Hacienda Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Evans v. FossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Firth v. MarovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Quatman v. McCrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Kite Hill Community Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Moss Development Co. v. GearyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Johnson v. LintonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Ross v. HarootunianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Clark v. Rancho Santa Fe Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API