Legal Opinion
Elliott v. Healthcare Corp.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 1993No. 91-CV-1275PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Associate Judge:
Appellants, Lawrence and Sarah Elliott, appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees, Healthcare Inc. and Grant Park Dialysis Center. On appeal, appellants claim that there are genuine issues of material fact in dispute for each of their nine claims arising out of the termination of Lawrence Elliott's employment with the Grant Park Center. These claims are: breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith, abusive discharge, defamation, public disclosure of private facts, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Adams v. George W. Cochran & Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Waldon v. CovingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Williams v. BakerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Paul v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & FlomDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Kerrigan v. Britches of Georgetowne, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Crowley v. North American Telecommunications Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.