Legal Opinion

Landowners, Oil, Gas & Royalty Owners Ex Rel. Romang v. Corporation Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 9, 1966No. 41132PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice:

This is an appeal by a majority of the landowners, gas, oil and royalty owners, hereinafter designated protestants, who own properties covered by drilling and spacing order No. 55417, entered by the Corporation Commission, hereinafter designated Commission.

Champlin Oil & Refining Company submitted its application to establish both gas- and oil drilling and spacing units for the-further development of the Mississippi Lime formation in the Northeast Enid Field, sometimes called the Enid Breckenridge Field, in Garfield County.

After the hearing, the Commission found,, inter alia:

“Th…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Oklahoma Natural Gas Company v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Wood Oil Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Woody v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Mee v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sunray DX Oil Company v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Sylvania Corp. v. KilborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. SILOAM SPRINGS HOTEL, LLC v. CENTURY SURETY COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  4. City of Oklahoma City v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Department of LaborSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. City of Oklahoma City v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Department of LaborSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API